[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_btn title=”Anthropological Controversies” align=”left” i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-chevron-left” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fjordanhaug.com%2Fcourses%2Foceania%2Fassignments%2Fcontroversies-in-anthropology%2F|||”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_btn title=”Anthropology of Oceania” align=”right” i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-home” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fjordanhaug.com%2Fcourses%2Foceania%2F|||”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Read the following articles and compare them to the July 6th readings about Derek Freeman’s criticisms of Margaret Mead’s research in Samoa. Follow the rest of the “Anthropological Controversies” page.

  • Jarvie, I.C. (2012). The Freeman-Mead Controversy Revisited: Or the Attempted Trashing of Derek Freeman. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (4): 531-41.
  • Shankman, P. (forthcoming). The Mead–Freeman Controversy Continues: A Reply to Ian Jarvie. Philosophy of the Social Sciences.

Suggested:

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_btn title=”Anthropological Controversies” align=”left” i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-chevron-left” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fjordanhaug.com%2Fcourses%2Foceania%2Fassignments%2Fcontroversies-in-anthropology%2F|||”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_btn title=”Anthropology of Oceania” align=”right” i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-home” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fjordanhaug.com%2Fcourses%2Foceania%2F|||”][/vc_column][/vc_row]